000			01383naa a2200181uu 4500
001			11608
003			OSt
005			20190211155538.0
008			030228s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aLAUTH, Thomas P _95913
245	1	0	_aThe Midyear Appropriation in Georgia : _ba threat to comprehensiveness?
260			_c2000
520	3		_aGeorgia'a Midyear Appropriation process can be examined in the context of two competing principles of government budgeting: flexibility and comprehensiveness. This article describes the Georgia midyear amendment process, identifies the patterns of agency midyear appropriation changes for the period FY 1994-2000. and assesses the extent to which the budgeting principle of comprehensiveness is violated by the state's midyear appropriation amendment. Despite the apparent violation of the comprehenbsiveness principle, the midyear appropriation amendment is deeply rooted in state practice. The amendment reflects the fiscal conservatism of executive and legislative leaders, serves the district and constituency needs of individual legislators, increases flexibility in budget execution , and is accpeted as normal practice by state agencies
773	0	8	_tState and Local Government Review _g34, 3, p. 198-204 _d, 2000 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20030228 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20060327 _b1422^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c11731 _d11731
041			_aeng