000 | 01803naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 11639 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211155548.0 | ||
008 | 030306s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aSMITH, Mike _910106 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aProgressive regimes, partnerships and the involvement of local communities : _ba framework for evaluation |
260 |
_bR.W.A.Rhodes, _c2000 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThis paper examines the nature of community involvement in urban politics as it is played out through regeneration partnerships. At a theoretical level, it explores the potential for a community dimension to local governance, that is, a strategic influence for comminties within locla power strucutres. It is argued that the nature of involvement can be explicated by considering three concepts: power ( as expressed by urban regime theory), parcipation and partnership. The paper explores these three broad themes and then focuses on the particular issues pertaining to community involvement in partnership working. Building on this framework, the paper develops a model - a "whell of involvement"- for analysing the effectiveness of community involvement to be `quantified by the use of a simple questionare survey. It provides a tool for academic researches and practitioners concerned with evaluating partnerships to begin to explore the quality and level of community involvement in the process of urban renewal. The results of an analysis of two regeneration partnerships are presented as an illustration of the efficacy of the evaluative technique | |
700 | 1 |
_aBEAZLEY, Mike _920384 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPublic Administration: an international quarterly _g78, 4, p. 855-878 _dR.W.A.Rhodes, 2000 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20030306 _bCassio _cCassio |
||
998 |
_a20060328 _b1615^b _cQuiteria |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c11762 _d11762 |
||
041 | _aeng |