000			02002naa a2200193uu 4500
001			11704
003			OSt
005			20190211155611.0
008			030310s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aGEVA-MAY, Iris _94035
245	1	0	_aDevelopments in policy analysis and evaluation in Israeli public administration
260			_bR.A.W. Rhodes, _c2000
520	3		_aEstablished in 198, Israel can be considered a new developing state in transition; on the other hand, it can be viewed as a modern western society and the only strong democracy in a rather unstable region. While the former implies lack of public administration tradition and the need to invest in basic infrastructures, the latter requires, among other responbilities, the adoption of norms of systematic policy planning, and accountability. In Israel, security problems, limited (and loss of) resources, lack of stability and huge waves of immigration have displaced more mundane issues such as administrative reforms and systematic policy planning approaches. From its inception, there was constant criticism of the state`s lack of established norms, functions , and skilled practitioners, particularly in policy analysis and evaluation. At first criticism came from academia (especially Dror 1968,1971), but in time it crossed lines and was raised by parties and Members of Parliament (the Knesset), and constituted a major issue in the work of different committees concerned with reforms in the public service and in government reorganizaton. This paper (1) will discuss the main reasons for the shortcomings of Israeli public policy analysis, evaluation and planning, and (2) will present shifts in conceptualization during recent years, with regard to systematic policy making
700	1		_aKFIR, Aharon _920394
773	0	8	_tPublic Administration: an international quarterly _g78, 2, p. 409-422 _dR.A.W. Rhodes, 2000 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20030310 _bCassio _cCassio
998			_a20060330 _b1131^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c11827 _d11827
041			_aeng