000			01570naa a2200193uu 4500
001			11781
003			OSt
005			20190211155636.0
008			030314s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aSAVITCH, H.V _99589
245	1	0	_aMetropolitan Consolidation versus Metropolitan Governance in Luisville
260			_c2000
520	3		_aTwo paths to New Regionalism are being pursued in American metropolises. One route, metropolitan consolidation, focuses on restructuring formal government. The other route, metropolitan governance, aims to restructure intergovernmental relations and processes. In a case study of Louisville and Jefferson County, Kentucky, the authors compare the two approaches. Following two failed efforts at city-county consolidation, Luisville-Jefferson County forged a city-county compact to bring about metropolitan governance, even in the absence of metropolitan government. The compact provides dor tax sharing, joint service provision , and a moratorium on new municipal incorporation or annexation. Civic leaders are now calling for metropolitan consolidation. An alternative proposal for the creation of the federated city that would have built on the compact was rejected. After considering both approaches, the authors conclude that a governance strategy will better advance the agenda of New Regionalism
700	1		_aVOGEL, Ronald K _920418
773	0	8	_tState and Local Government Review _g32, 3, p. 198-212 _d, 2000 _w
942			_cG
998			_a20030314 _bCassio _cCassio
998			_a20060403 _b1151^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c11904 _d11904
041			_aeng