000			01598naa a2200181uu 4500
001			11831
003			OSt
005			20190211155647.0
008			020401s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aBUTHE, Tim _91643
245	1	0	_aTaking temporality seriously : _bmodeling history and the use of narratives as evidence
260			_bAmerican Political Science Association, _c2002
520	3		_aSocial scientists interested in explaining historical processes can, indeed should, reuse the choice between modeling causal relationships and studying history. Indetifying temporality as the defining characteristic of processes that can be meaningfully distinguished as history. I show that modeling such phenomena engenders particular difficulties but is both possible and fruitful. Narratives, as a way of presenting empirical information, have distinctive strenghts that make them especially suited for scholarship, and structuring the narratives based on the model allows us to treat them as data on which to test the model. At the same time, this use of narratives raises methodological problems not identified in recent debates. I specify these problems, analyze their implications, and suggest ways of solving or minimizing them. There is no inherent imcompatibility between - but much potential gain from - modeling history and using historical narratives as data
773	0	8	_tAmerican Political Science Review _g96, 3, p. 481-493 _dAmerican Political Science Association, 2002 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20020401 _bKaren _cKaren
998			_a20060404 _b0945^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c11954 _d11954
041			_aeng