000			01800naa a2200181uu 4500
001			11837
003			OSt
005			20190211155648.0
008			030403s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aMcDONAGH, Eileen _96922
245	1	0	_aPolitical citizenship and democratization : _bthe gender paradox
260			_bAmerican Political Science Association, _c2002
520	3		_aThis research challenges models of democratization that claim liberal principles affirming the equality of rights-bearing individuals equably enhance the political inclusion of groups amrginalized by race, class, or gender. While such explanations may suffice for race and class, this study`s quantitative cross-national analysis of women`s contemporary officeholding patterns establishes that gender presents a counter case whereby women`s political citizenship is enhancing, first by government institutions that paradoxically affirm both individual equality and kinship group difference and, second, by state policies that paradoxically affirm both individual equality and women`s group difference. These findings challenge assumptions about the relationship between political citizenship and democratization, demonstrate how women`s political inclusion as voters and officeholders is stregthened not by either a sameness principle (asserting women`s euqlity to men as individuals) or a difference principle (asserting women`s group difference from men) but rather by paradoxical combination of both, and provide new views for assessing multiculturalism prospects within democratic states
773	0	8	_tAmerican Political Science Review _g96, 3, p. 535-552 _dAmerican Political Science Association, 2002 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20030403 _bKaren _cKaren
998			_a20060404 _b1110^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c11960 _d11960
041			_aeng