000			01391naa a2200193uu 4500
001			11850
003			OSt
005			20190211155653.0
008			030408s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aDRYZEK, John S _93076
245	1	0	_aSocial choice theory and deliberative democracy : _ba reconciliation
260			_bCambridge University Press, _c2003
520	3		_aThe two most influential traditions of contemporary theorizing about democracy, social choice theory and deliberative democracy are generally thought to be at loggerheads, in that one demonstrates the impossibility, instability or meaningglessness of the rational collective outcomes sought by the other. We argue that the two traditions can be reconciled. After expounding the central Arrow and Gibbard-Satterthwaite impossibility results, we reassess their implications, identifying the conditions under which meaningful democratic decision making is possible. We argue that deliberation can promote these conditions, and hence that social choice theory suggest not that democratic decision making is impossible, but rather that democracy must have a deliberative aspect
700	1		_aLIST, Christian _920443
773	0	8	_tBritish Journal of Political science _g33, 1, p. 1-28 _dCambridge University Press, 2003 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20030408 _bKaren _cKaren
998			_a20060404 _b1123^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c11973 _d11973
041			_aeng