000 | 01625naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 11925 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211155715.0 | ||
008 | 030423s2003 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aVARTIAINEN, Pirkko _910910 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aThe substance of stakeholder evaluation : _bmethodological discussion |
260 |
_aNew York : _bMarcel Dekker, _c2003 |
||
520 | 3 | _aWhat is the scientific and methodological background, the nature of different stakeholder groups, and the quality of stakeholder information produced in the evaluation process? Different stakeholders have different experience, interest, attitudes, and motives to participate in the evaluation process. Thus, the data collected in the stakeholder evaluation have many implicit and explicit characteristics that have to be recognized when the data is analysed and the results of the evaluation process transferred to the development work of an organisation. This article suggest that the reliable stakeholder, and especially the multiple constituency evaluation process has to follow six principles. These principles are the context bound theory, the ability to apply both qualitative and quantitative methods, versatility of data collection, stakeholder participation, ways of forming the evaluation indicators and criteria, and the options for analysis of the information produced by the evaluation process | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA _g26, 1, p. 1-18 _dNew York : Marcel Dekker, 2003 _xISSN 01900692 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20030423 _bKaren _cKaren |
||
998 |
_a20100723 _b1518^b _cDaiane |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c12046 _d12046 |
||
041 | _aeng |