| 000 | 01765naa a2200253uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 12077 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211155742.0 | ||
| 008 | 030529s2003 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aJONES, Erik _95269 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aIdiosyncrasy and integration : _bsuggestions from comparative political economy |
| 260 | _cFebruary 2003 | ||
| 520 | 3 | _aThere is a growing consensus in comparative political economy that globalization is not eliminating the distinctive character of specific nation-states. Even in Europe, where formal integration between countries is most profound, nation-states remain idiosyncratic. Starting from this consensus, the questions I ask ar: (a) how can we explain the coincidence of national idiosyncracy and international integration; (b) what does our explanation tell us about processes of European integration? The answers, I argue, lie in two theoretical traditions - one stemming from Karl Polanyi`s (1957) insistence on the social embeddedness of market institutions and the other from Gunnar Myrdal`s (1956) interpretation of the cumulative casuality behind integration at the national and international levels. Although well received in other areas, neither tradition has played much of a role in the study of the European Union. The article concludes by suggesting a research program that could develop from the interface between idiosyncrasy and integration | |
| 650 | 4 |
_aConvergence _919415 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aDivergence _920556 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aGlobalization _917160 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aIntegration _916282 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aMyrdal _920557 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aPolanyi _920558 |
|
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of European Public Policy _g10, 1, p. 140-158 _d, February 2003 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20030529 _bKaren _cKaren |
||
| 998 |
_a20100623 _b1251^b _cCarolina |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c12169 _d12169 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||