000			01382naa a2200181uu 4500
001			5060314461910
003			OSt
005			20190211155940.0
008			050603s2003 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aSOBECK, Joanne _921289
245	1	0	_aComparing policy process frameworks : _bwhat do they tell us about group membership and participation for policy development?
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cJuly 2003
520	3		_aTheoretical models impose a framework for viewing the policy process. Some emphasize institutional rules. Others focus on beliefs and values. This research, using a case study of substance abuse policy development within a local community context, examines three frameworks: the advocacy coalition framework (ACF), bureaucratic politics framework, and institutional analysis and development framework (IADF). The frameworks examine an early stage of policy development emphasizing group membership and participation. The results show that membership and participation were best explained using the AFC and the IADF. Strnghts and challenges in using each framework are discussed, as well as implications for local policy making
773	0	8	_tAdministration & Society _g35, 3, p. 350-374 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, July 2003 _xISSN 00953997 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20050603 _b1446^b _cTiago
998			_a20100720 _b1133^b _cDaiane
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c13164 _d13164
041			_aeng