000 01569naa a2200253uu 4500
001 5060910230510
003 OSt
005 20240719063200.0
008 050609s2004 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100 1 _aLOWERY, Daniel.
_921327
245 1 0 _aThe iron cage of methodology :
_bthe vicious circle of means limiting ends limiting means...
260 _aThousand Oaks :
_bSAGE,
_cJuly 2004
520 3 _aThis article addresses the strategies and tools that public administration scholars use to understand phenomena of interest. The range of qualitative methods used has been limited, and the kinf of rigor generally associated with quantitative methods has largely been absent in the application of their quantitative counterparts. Two conclusions are drawn from an analysis of articles published in two respected journals: Training on research methods in ph.D and M.P.A programs should be expanded to include a broader range of strategies and tools, and the rigorous use of a broader ranger of research tools promises to better position the field of public administration to identify, examine, and answer the many big questions that it now faces
650 4 _912916
_aAdministração Estratégica
650 4 _aMétodo
_912245
650 4 _aPesquisa Aplicada
_913707
650 4 _aQualidade
_912842
700 1 _aEVANS, Karen G
_93316
773 0 8 _tAdministration & Society
_g36, 3, p. 306-327
_dThousand Oaks : SAGE, July 2004
_xISSN 00953997
_w
942 _cS
998 _a20050609
_b1023^b
_cTiago
998 _a20100720
_b1022^b
_cDaiane
999 _aConvertido do Formato PHL
_bPHL2MARC21 1.1
_c13204
_d13204
041 _aeng