000			01718naa a2200181uu 4500
001			5061010510810
003			OSt
005			20190211155957.0
008			050610s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aLIEBERMAN, Robert C _96095
245	1	0	_aIdeas, Institutions, and Political Order : _bexplaining political change
260			_aNew York : _bCambridge University Press, _cDecember 2002
520	3		_aInstitutional approaches to explaning plitical phenomena suffer from three common limitations: reductionism, reliance on exogenous factors, and excessive emphasis on order and structure. Ideational approaches to political explanation, while oftem more sensitive to change and agency, largely exhibit the same shortcomings. In particular, both perspectives share an emphasis on discerning and explaining patterns of ordered regularity in politics, making it hard to explain important episodes of political change. Relaxing this emphasis on order and viewing politics as situated in multiple and not necessarily equilibrated order suggests a way of synthesizing institutional and ideational approaches and developing more convincing accounts of political change. In this view, change arises out of 'friction" among mismatched institutional and ideational patterns. An account of America civil right policy in the 1960s and 1970s, wich is not amenable to either straightfoward institutional or ideational explanation, demonstrates the advantages of the approach.
773	0	8	_tAmerican Political Science Review _g96, 4, p. 697-712 _dNew York : Cambridge University Press, December 2002 _xISSN 0003-0554 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20050610 _b1051^b _cTiago
998			_a20050610 _b1051^b _cTiago
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c13224 _d13224
041			_aeng