000			01619naa a2200169uu 4500
001			5061415514710
003			OSt
005			20190211160002.0
008			050614s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aPETERSON, M. J _921363
245	1	0	_aDiverging orbits : _bsituation definitions in creation of regimes for broadcast and remate sensing satellites
260			_aNew York : _bCambridge University Press, _cMay 2004
520	3		_aThe divergent results of two roughly simultaneous negotiations about international regimes for TV broadcasting and remote sensing from satellites revel that governments do not form preferences by referring only to the interests emphasized in rational choice accounts or to identities emphasized in sociological institutionalist ones. Tracing the course of the negotiations reveals that governments´ perceptions of the interests and indentities at stake, and their formulation of their preferences are shaped by understanding of the contours of the problem or issue at hand. These understandings, or situation definitions, structure political interactions by indicating the casual and moral beliefs relevant to the question hand, the range of efficacious and acceptable policy means available for addressing it, and the sorts of authority, expertise, skills, and ohter resources that give particular actors strong claims to inclusion in the process of deciding how to address it.
773	0	8	_tAmerican Political Science review _g98, 2, p. 277-292 _dNew York : Cambridge University Press, May 2004 _xISSN 003-0554 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20050614 _b1551^b _cTiago
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c13249 _d13249
041			_aeng