000			01633naa a2200181uu 4500
001			5082516381217
003			OSt
005			20190211160053.0
008			050825s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aWEISBURD, David _921564
245	1	0	_aHot spots policing experiments and criminal justice research : _blessons from the field
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cMay 2005
520	3		_aIn this article, more general lessons are drawn from two randomized experiments in hot spots policing that the author helped design and implement in the 1990s: the Minneapolis Hot Spots Experiment and the Jersey City Drug Market Analysis Experiment. Using a case study approach, factors that facilitate and inhibit development and implementation of randomized trials are identified with particular focus on the special problems and/or advantages of place -based experiments. While the author's main commments focus on the success of place-based randomized trials in evaluating hot spots policing approaches, he draws insight as well into the reasons why the successful example of experiments in hot spots policing has not inspired similar place-based experimentation in other areas of policing or criminal justice. Eight specific lessons regarding the implementation and development of place-based randomized trials and experimental methods more generally are identified.
773	0	8	_tThe Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science _g599, p. 220-245 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, May 2005 _xISSN 00027162 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20050825 _b1638^b _cAnaluiza
998			_a20100803 _b1036^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c13426 _d13426
041			_aeng