000			01499naa a2200193uu 4500
001			5090614590317
003			OSt
005			20190211160111.0
008			050906s2004 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aBOSK, Charles L. _921627
245	1	0	_aBureaucracies of mass deception : _binstitutional review boards and the ethics of ethnographic research
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cSeptember 2004
520	3		_aEthographers have long been unhappy with the review of their research proposals by institutional review boards (IRBs). In this article, we offer a sociological view of the problems associated with prospective IRB review of ethnographic research. Coompared with researchers in other fields, social scientists have been less willing to accommodate themselves to IRB oversight; we identify the reasons for this reluctance, and in an effort to promote such accommodation, we suggest several steps to reduce the frustration associated with IRB review of ethnnographic researh. We conclude by encouraging ethnographers to be alert to the ways the procedural and bureaucratic demands of IRBs can displace thier efforts to solve the serious ethical dilemmas posed by ethnography.
700	1		_aVRIES, Raymond G. De _921628
773	0	8	_tThe Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science _g595, p. 249-263 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, September 2004 _xISSN 00027162 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20050906 _b1459^b _cAnaluiza
998			_a20100803 _b1023^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c13486 _d13486
041			_aeng