000			01639naa a2200181uu 4500
001			5090615190917
003			OSt
005			20190211160112.0
008			050906s2004 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aKATZ, Jack _921632
245	1	0	_aOn the rhetoric and politics of ethnographic methodology
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cSeptember 2004
520	3		_aIN a variety of ways, all ethnographies are politically cast and policy relevant. Each of three recurrent political rhetorics is related to a unique set of fieldwork practices. Ethnographies that report holistically on journeys to "the other side" build policy/political significance by contesting popular stereotypes. Theoretical ethnographies draw on political imagination to fill for a lack of variations in participant observation data and to model an area of social life without attempting to rule out alternative explanations. Comparative analytic studies build political relevance by revealing social forces that are hidden by local cultures. Each of these three genres of ethnographic methodology faces unique challenges in relating fieldwork data to polotically significant explanations. By shaping the ethnographer's relations to subjects and readers, each methodology also structures a distinctive class identity for the researchers - as worker, as aristocrat, or as bourgeois professional
773	0	8	_tThe Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science _g595, p. 280-308 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, September 2004 _xISSN 00027162 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20050906 _b1519^b _cAnaluiza
998			_a20100803 _b1024^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c13488 _d13488
041			_aeng