000			01760naa a2200181uu 4500
001			5090616194117
003			OSt
005			20190211160113.0
008			050906s2004 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aNEWMAN, Kathe _921635
245	1	0	_aNewark, decline and avoidance, renaissance and desire : _bfrom disinvestment to reinvestment
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cJuly 2004
520	3		_aAfter more than fifty yeas of neglect and disinvestment, aconomically distrsse urban neighborhoods have become the targets for reinvestment. This article is an exploration of the changing context of urban revitalization using Newark, New Jersey, and two of its neighborhoods. A key argument is that the 1990s and early 2000s mark a particularly significant moment in history for U.S. cities. First, cities are seeking a competitive position within a global economy. Second, neoliberal urban policy and a decentralized and partially dismantled welfare state leave local government with few redistributive resources, providing legitimancy to redevelopment that deconcentrates poverty and attracts middle-class residents. Third, dramatic rent gaps exist in their most impoverished neighborhoods. Local governments increasingly view housing development as an economic development strategy in wich gentrification is the preferred pattern of redevelopment. This approach does not benefit low-income residents. However, unlike earlier periods, community-based resistance to neoliberal policies is muted
773	0	8	_tThe Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science _g594, p. 34-48 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, July 2004 _xISSN 00027162 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20050906 _b1619^b _cAnaluiza
998			_a20100803 _b1017^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c13492 _d13492
041			_aeng