000			01829naa a2200181uu 4500
001			5091517240817
003			OSt
005			20190211160129.0
008			050915s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aHARTWICK, Elaine; PEET, Richard _921741
245	1	0	_aNeoliberalism and Nature : _bthe case of the WTO
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSage Publications, _cNovember 2003
520	3		_aPolitical pressures exerted by environmental movements have forced governemnts otherside sommited to neoliberal policies to find reconciliatory policy positions between two contradictory political imperatives - economic growth and environmental protection. This article explores some ideological means of reconciliation, as with notions of sustainable development, wich appear to bridge the impassable divide, and some of the institutional means for dealing with contradiction, as mith the displacement of political power upward, away from elected national governments and toward international agreements and nonelected global governance institutions. Through these two strategic maneuvers, the authors argue, environmental concern has been ideologically and institutionally incorporated into the global neoliberal hegemony of the late twentieth century. The global capitalist economy can grow, if not with clear environmental conscience, then with one effectively assuaged. This process of neoliberal deflection is illustrated using the case of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the World Trade Organizations
650		4	_aEnvironmental Agreements; Growth; Ideology; Neoliberalism _921742
773	0	8	_tThe Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science _g590, p. 188-211 _dThousand Oaks : Sage Publications, November 2003 _xISSN 0002-7162 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20050915 _b1724^b _cAnaluiza
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c13581 _d13581
041			_aeng