000			01544naa a2200193uu 4500
001			5092116572717
003			OSt
005			20230831175256.0
008			050921s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_917794 _aLipsey, Mark W.
245	1	0	_aThose Confounded Moderators in Meta-Analysis : _bgood, bad, and ugly
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSage Publications, _cMay 2003
520	3		_aOne of the more revealing aspects of meta-analysis is the relationship between effect sizes and moderator variables representing differences among studies in their methods, samples, and interventions. However, interesting moderator variables can make the results of any analysis focusing on a single moderator variable misleading. Despite the ambiguity of such results, this form of analysis is common in meta-analytic studies of intervention. The hazards and complexities of investigating and interpreting confounded moderator variables are illustrated in this article by the author's examining the difference in effect sizes associated with randomized versus nonrandomized designs in a large meta-analytic data base of delinquency intervention studies
650		4	_aModerator Variables; Meta-Analysis; Juvenile; Delinquency; Intervention; Research Design; Random Assignment _921842
773	0	8	_tThe Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science _g587, p. 69-81 _dThousand Oaks : Sage Publications, May 2003 _xISSN 0002-7162 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20050921 _b1657^b _cAnaluiza
998			_a20050930 _b1529^b _cAnaluiza
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c13632 _d13632
041			_aeng