000			01984naa a2200169uu 4500
001			5092617401817
003			OSt
005			20190211160146.0
008			050926s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aCLARKE, Harold ...et.al _921906
245	1	0	_aMen, Women and the Dynamics of Presidential Approval
260			_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _cJanuary 2005
520	3		_aAlthough commentary on the 'gender gap' is a staple of political discourse in the United States, most analyses of the dynamics of presidential approval have ignored possible gender differences in the forces driving approval ratings of US presidents. This article analyses gender differences in the impact of economic evaluations and political interventions on the dynamics of presidential approval between 1978 and 1997. The analyses are made possible by disaggregating 240 monthly Survey of Consumers datasets gathered over this period. These data show that women's economic evaluations are consistently more pessimistic than men's, regardless of who occupied the Oval Office. Analyses of rival presidential approval models reveal that a national prospective economic evaluation model performs best for women, but a personal prospective model works best for a men. Parameter estimates indicate that economic evaluations accounted for substantial proportions of gender differences in presidential approval in the post-Carter era. Men and women also reacted differently to presidential transitions, with approval increasing more among men when Reagan replaced Carter, and more among women when Clinton replaced Bush. The hypothesis that men are more suceptible than women to raly effects induced by domestic and international crises and wars does not receive consistent support
773	0	8	_tBritish Journal of Political Science _g35, 1, p. 31-51 _dCambridge : Cambridge University Press, January 2005 _xISSN 0007-1234 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20050926 _b1740^b _cAnaluiza
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c13665 _d13665
041			_aeng