000			01508naa a2200169uu 4500
001			5092714435717
003			OSt
005			20190211160146.0
008			050927s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aMEDEARIS, John _96990
245	1	0	_aSocial Movements and Deliberative Democratic Theory
260			_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _cJanuary 2005
520	3		_aDeliberative democrats are committed both to inclusion and to barring coercion in public discourse. Their commitment to democratic inclusion should make them sympathetic to the challenges faced by social movements. An adequate sociology of contentious public discourse, however, shows that social movements must often act coerciverly in order to be included. For example, they must often alter the terrain of conflict, create a crisis, pressure interlocutors to argue consistently, or compel other parties to enter social arenas of contention that they have avoided. Democratic theorists who are commited to inclusion should approve of such coercion. Under the actual circumstances movements face, there is a tension between non-coercion and democratic inclusion. This tension demonstrates the need for a democratic standard and a mode od democratic social analysis beyond those that deliberative theory offers
773	0	8	_tBritish Journal of Political Science _g35, 1, p. 53-75 _dCambridge : Cambridge University Press, January 2005 _xISSN 0007-1234 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20050927 _b1443^b _cAnaluiza
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c13672 _d13672
041			_aeng