000			01727naa a2200169uu 4500
001			5092715574317
003			OSt
005			20190211160148.0
008			050927s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aWHITE, Stephen; OATES, Sarah; McALLISTER, Ian _921925
245	1	0	_aMedia Effects and Russian Elections, 1999-2000
260			_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _cApril 2005
520	3		_aThe Russian parliamentary and presidential elections of December 1999 and March 2000 appeared to have been won in large part through the partisam use of (particularly state) television. According to the evidence of a spring 2001 national survey, television was the main source of political information for the supporters of all parties and candidates. However, state television (which had been most supportive f the Kremlin) was much more likely to be favoured by the supporters of the pro-regime Unity party: while commercial television (which had provide a more even-handed coverage of the elections) was more popular and respected among the supporters of anti-Kremlin parties and candidates and less popular among supporters of Vladimir Putin. Regression analysis that takes account of reciprocal causation between media source and vote choice indicates that these were not spurious associations. The findings suggest that the state itself may exercise a disproportionate influence upon the electoral process in newly established systems in wich social structures and political allegiances remain fluid
773	0	8	_tBritish Journal of Political Science _g35, 2, p. 191-208 _dCambridge : Cambridge University Press, April 2005 _xISSN 0007-1234 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20050927 _b1557^b _cAnaluiza
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c13679 _d13679
041			_aeng