000			01959naa a2200169uu 4500
001			5100414331817
003			OSt
005			20190211160158.0
008			051004s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aKENNY, Christopher; McBURNETT, Michael; BORDUA, David _921967
245	1	0	_aThe Impact of Political Interests in the 1994 and 1996 Congressional Elections : _bthe role of the national Rifle association
260			_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _cApril 2004
520	3		_aThis article explores the role of organized interests in congressional elections by examinig the National Rifle Association (NRA) in contested House races in 1994 and 1996. Most research on the electoral impact of organized interests reports that groups have a negligible impact on the outcome. Yet anecdotal evidence regarding NRA influence abounds, particularly in 1994. We construct an aggregate model of congressional vote share that allows us to systematically analyse the electoral impact of the NRA in 1994 and 1996 House races. Unlike previous research of this sort, we provide evidence that the NRA can have a statistically discernible effect on election outcomes, but not in all elections and for all candidates. The NRA endorsement was particularly helpful to Republican challehgers in 1994 (and to some extent Republican incumbents), but much less helpful to Democrats. These effects are much reduced in 1996 for all cadidates. Likewise, having lots of NRA members in the district helped Republican challengers the most (in 1994) and Democrats not at all. Finally, reasons as to why the NRA was able to amplify but not mitigate the party trend, as well as individual-level mechanisms that might produce an endorcement effect, are discussed
773	0	8	_tBritish Journal of Political Science _g34, 2, p. 331-344 _dCambridge : Cambridge University Press, April 2004 _xISSN 0007-1234 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20051004 _b1433^b _cAnaluiza
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c13732 _d13732
041			_aeng