000 | 01669naa a2200169uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 5100517235217 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211160203.0 | ||
008 | 051005s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aCOWLEY, Philip; CHILDS, Sarah _921983 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aToo Spineless to Rebel? : _bnew labour's women MPs |
260 |
_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _cJuly 2003 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe 1997 British general election saw a record 120 women returned to the House of Commons, 101 of them Labour. Yet if the most striking feature of the 1997 intake into the house of Commons was the number of newly elected women, then the most striking feature of the backbench rebellions in that parliament was the lack of these women amongst the ranks of the rebels. They were less than half as likely to rebel against the party whip as the rest of the Parliamentary Labour Party; even those who did, did so around half as often. Attempts to explain this difference fall into two broad groups: (i) those that attempt to explain the difference away, as resulting from other characteristics of the women, and (ii) those that attempt to explain it - indeed, celebrate it - as evidence of a different, women's style of political behavior. Attempts at (i) are largely uncovincing: most of the supposed explanations for the difference do not stand up to empirical verification. Although difficult to prove, a belief in (ii) is dominant amongst the new women themselves | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tBritish Journal of Political Science _g33, 3, p. 345-365 _dCambridge : Cambridge University Press, July 2003 _xISSN 0007-1234 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20051005 _b1723^b _cAnaluiza |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c13750 _d13750 |
||
041 | _aeng |