000 | 01433naa a2200169uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 5111011431210 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190218141710.0 | ||
008 | 051110s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 fre d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aSAINT-MARTIN, Denis _922366 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aL´affaire Groupaction : _bun cas de politisation de la fonction publique fédérale? |
260 |
_aToronto : _bIPAC, _cWinter 2003 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe Groupaction affair draws attention to two forms of politicization in the federal public service, one partisan and the other structural. Partisan politicization and the integration of political staff within the public service through Section 39 of The Public Service Employment Act have become more common in recent years. The concept of structural politicization underlines how the Canadian public service is not politically neutral in the face of those wishing to undo the federal order. While it does not constitute an excuse that could justify the type of behaviour observed in the Groupaction affair, structural politicization provides a context for understanding why some public servants thought it could be legitimate to circumvent the rules in order to preserve national unity | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tCanadian Public Administration : the journal of the Institute of Public Administration of Canada _g46, 4, p. 450-470 _dToronto : IPAC, Winter 2003 _xISSN 008-4840 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20051110 _b1143^b _cTiago |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c14048 _d14048 |
||
041 | _afre |