000 01746naa a2200169uu 4500
001 5111015550510
003 OSt
005 20190218141711.0
008 051110s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 fre d
100 1 _aCOMEAU, Paul-André; COUTURE, Maurice
_922378
245 1 0 _aAccès à l'information et renseignements personnels :
_ble précedent québécois
260 _aToronto :
_bIPAC,
_cFall 2003
520 3 _aIn 1982, the Quebec national assembly brought access to information and the protection of personal information together under one piece of legislation. It created then a new independent body, the “Commission d’accès à l’information (CAI)” (information and privacy commission), to ensure the monitoring of this legislation. Twenty years later, a first assessment of the path taken by Quebec reveals how the CAI has been fulfilling its mandate and identifies the reasons and circumstances for extending the scope of the CAI’s responsibilities. As most of the legislative assemblies in the rest of Canada have imitated the Quebec “model” by creating the position of information and privacy commissioner, the questions that arise from this examination have a broader scope. These questions bear mainly on the co-existence of several mandates and on the commission’s accountability to the private sector with regard to personal information. Moreover, they focus on the meaning of the relationship of this commission to the national assembly as the watchdog of the public administration
773 0 8 _tCanadian Public Administration : the journal of the Institute of Public Administration of Canada
_g46, 3, p. 364-389
_dToronto : IPAC, Fall 2003
_xISSN 008-4840
_w
942 _cS
998 _a20051110
_b1555^b
_cTiago
999 _aConvertido do Formato PHL
_bPHL2MARC21 1.1
_c14054
_d14054
041 _afre