000 | 01634naa a2200169uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 5111016225010 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211160229.0 | ||
008 | 051110s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aGOW, J.I.; HODGETTS, J. E _922381 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aWhere are we coming from? : _bare they any useful lessons from our administrative history? |
260 |
_aToronto : _bIPAC, _cSummer 2003 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThis article challenges the notion that contemporary conditions are so new that there are no useful lessons to be learned from administrative history. Beginning with the observation that many recent innovations in public organizations were foreshadowed under the United Canadas, 1841-1867, it asks why they were gradually abandoned over the first century of Confederation, only to be revived recently. For reasons of efficiency and democratic governance, the department became the keystone organization of Canadian public administration, and bureaucracy the key decision making technology. Changes in economic conditions, technology, elite ideology and political culture led to the introduction of public management as an alternative to bureaucracy. Neither form has met all the needs of politicians, public servants and citizens. One lesson of the past is that other values, like representativeness, will assert themselves with the result that the system will continue to evolve | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tCanadian Public Administration : the journal of the Institute of Public Administration of Canada _g46, 2, p. 178-201 _dToronto : IPAC, Summer 2003 _xISSN 008-4840 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20051110 _b1622^b _cTiago |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c14057 _d14057 |
||
041 | _aeng |