000			01458naa a2200169uu 4500
001			5111112052810
003			OSt
005			20190211160233.0
008			051111s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aHENSTRA, Dan _922390
245	1	0	_aFederal emergency management in Canada and the United States after 11 September 2001
260			_aToronto : _bIPAC, _cSpring 2003
520	3		_aResearch in the field of emergency management indicates that pre-disaster mitigation can significantly reduce the costs of post-disaster reconstruction and recovery. Yet, it is often difficult for disaster mitigation advocates to gamer the support of policy - and decision-makers, who tend to focus on other community concerns. Interest indisaster mitigation tends to be highest during the period immediately following a major disaster, when public attention focuses on vulnerabilities that must be addressed through policy. The "focusing event" of 11 September 20 highlighted the vulnerability of a large urban area to disaster, in this case human-induced. The event had a significant impact on federal emergency management in Canada and the United States and shaped the nature of mitigation policy in the following year
773	0	8	_tCanadian Public Administration : the journal of the Institute of Public Administration of Canada _g46, 1, p. 103-116 _dToronto : IPAC, Spring 2003 _xISSN 008-4840 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20051111 _b1205^b _cTiago
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c14069 _d14069
041			_aeng