| 000 | 01687naa a2200169uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 5121917080317 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211160418.0 | ||
| 008 | 051219s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aEileen Quam _922764 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aInforming and evaluating a metadata initiative : _bUsability and metadata studies in Minnesotas Foundations Project |
| 260 |
_aNew York : _bPergamon, _c2001 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aMinnesotas Foundations Project is a multiagency collaboration to improve access to environmental and natural resources information. The Project chose the Dublin Core metadata standard for web resources. Three studies were conducted: needs assessment, Bridges web site user interface, and usability of controlled vocabulary in Dublin Core metadata. Based on these findings and information architecture, the Project published best practice guidelines. Controlled vocabulary is important to facilitate access. This is relevant to the third study on Dublin Core metadata, which tested keyword searches of web pages to determine the effectiveness of controlled vocabulary in the Dublin Core subject tag. Central to the Best Practice Guidelines is the User Guide to Dublin Core, which offers an element-by-element understanding of the metadata schema. Current bibliographies and reports show further background work that informed the decision-making process for such important choices as metadata schema, thesaurus and thesaurus management software, search engine, and RDF/XML standards | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tGovernment Information Quarterly _g18, 3, p. 181-194 _dNew York : Pergamon, 2001 _xISSN 0740-624X _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20051219 _b1708^b _cAnaluiza |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c14400 _d14400 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||