000 | 01495naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 6032015191921 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211160646.0 | ||
008 | 060320s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aNICKERSON, David W. _923339 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aPartisan mobilization using volunteer phone banks and door hangers |
260 |
_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cSeptember 2005 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThis article presents the results from a statewide partisan voter mobilization experiment in Michigan during the 2002 gubernatorial election. The tactis studied are volunteer phone calls boost turnout by 3.2 percentage points. This effect size impliese that both mobilization technologies are cost-competitive with a door knocking and that partisan and nonpartisan campaigns are equally effective at increasing turnout. A postelection survey was used to determine whether the partisan blandishments to vote changed candidate preference. No evidence of persuasion from campaign contact was detected by the survey. However, the survey did indicate that the campaign failed in targeting likely Democratic voters and exclueding likely Republican voters and excluding likely Republican voters, emplasizing the need for detailed party databases. | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science _g601, p. 10-27 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, September 2005 _xISSN 00027162 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20060320 _b1519^b _cNatália |
||
998 |
_a20100803 _b1037^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c14934 _d14934 |
||
041 | _aeng |