000 | 01503naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 6032016131421 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211160647.0 | ||
008 | 060320s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aRAMÍREZ, Ricardo _923342 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aGiving voice to latino voters : _ba field experiment on the effectiveness of a national nonpartisan mobilization effort |
260 |
_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cSeptember 2005 |
||
520 | 3 | _aIn this article, I present a summary of the findings of a randomized field experiment of 465,134 registered date. The National Association of latino Elected and Appointed effort in 2002 explored three alternative modes of communicating with voters: direct mail, robotic phone calls, and live phone calls produced a statistically significant increase in voter turnout. The ineffectiness of direct of direct mail and robotic calls is consistent with results from other experimental campaigns. What remais unclear is the extent to which direct mail and robotic calls targeting low-propensity Latino voters would be more effective in presidential elections. For the present, it appears that the most effective way to mobilize low-propensity Latino voters is through phone banks staffed by volunteers. | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science _g601, p. 66-84 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, September 2005 _xISSN 00027162 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20060320 _b1613^b _cNatália |
||
998 |
_a20100803 _b1038^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c14937 _d14937 |
||
041 | _aeng |