000 | 01332naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 6032114383821 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211160704.0 | ||
008 | 060321s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aLEVINE, Peter _923399 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aWhat we should know about the effectiveness of campaigns but dont |
260 |
_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cSeptember 2005 |
||
520 | 3 | _aIt would be useful as well as interesting to understand more about why people decide to vote. The theoretical literature suggests that they weigh the costs and benefits of voting and also consider the moral obligation to participate. Relevant empirical evidence comes from surveys, comparisons of states with differing laws and electoral processes, and randomized field studies of voter mobilization efforts. The randomized experiments are by far the most rigorous sources, and they have yielded some insights about why people choose to vote or not to vote. However, much remains to be investigated, and this article provides a research agenda. | |
700 | 1 |
_aLOPEZ, Mark Hugo _923400 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tThe Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science _g601, p. 180 - 191 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, September 2005 _xISSN 00027162 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20060321 _b1438^b _cNatália |
||
998 |
_a20100803 _b1038^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c14995 _d14995 |
||
041 | _aeng |