000			01640naa a2200181uu 4500
001			6032115360021
003			OSt
005			20190211160708.0
008			060321s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aPREWITT, Kenneth _923417
245	1	0	_aPolitical ideas and a political science for policy
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cJuly 2005
520	3		_aEarly in its development, political science established itself as part of modern secular authority, with something to say about government and politics. This achievement did not, though, lead to much noticeable impact on governance and policy, with the exception of administrative reforms. The past five decades have witnessed impressive growth in influence, as political science self-confidently embraced an idea-driven policy science. Political behaviorism, fashioned as a response to the loss of Enlightenment naiveté, was a political as well as a science project, and its successes, on both fronts, drew many to a new type of policy science. A leading example is neoconservatism, whose practioner political scientists linked new political ideas with applied social science as a basis for challenging assumptions of the regulatory welfare state. By the end of the twentieth century, political science had returned to its earliest mission(s)—building a better science and strengthening democratic practice.
773	0	8	_tThe Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science _g600, p. 14 - 29 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, July 2005 _xISSN 00027162 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20060321 _b1536^b _cNatália
998			_a20100803 _b1242^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c15009 _d15009
041			_aeng