000 02144naa a2200217uu 4500
001 6032315374021
003 OSt
005 20190211160739.0
008 060323s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100 1 _aDAVIS, Charles N.
_923684
245 1 0 _aReconciling privacy and access interests in E-government
260 _aPhiladelphia :
_bRoutledge,
_c2005
520 3 _aPrivacy is both the most often cited and the least understood rationale for information policy aimed at protecting the disclosure of governmental information. The use of privacy as a means of limiting governmental information sharing has expanded rapidly in recent years, as a variety of interests—all seemingly concerned with informational privacy—have emerged in the policy making arena. Governments increasingly turning to e-government solutions must confront privacy issues while maintaining access to governmental information.
520 3 _aOne of the most contentious privacy–access issues concerns the digitization of court records. Historically open to the public in paper form with limited exceptions, electronic court filings raise novel privacy issues unimagined by keepers of paper-based records systems. This paper looks at the rules that a number of municipal and state governments have adopted in order to move court records online. It examines the new court rules in light of the origins of informational privacy law, offering an avenue for comparing modern conceptualizations of data privacy with the legal principles created in seminal privacy decisions related to informational privacy. Using the rules themselves, the paper explores the dominant strands of privacy doctrine, illustrating the divide between privacy law and privacy policy regarding data protection statutes, freedom of information law exemptions, and other data controls.
590 _aVolume 28
590 _aNumbers 7-8
773 0 8 _tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA
_g28, 7-8 , p. 567 - 580
_dPhiladelphia : Routledge, 2005
_xISSN 01900692
_w
942 _cS
998 _a20060323
_b1537^b
_cNatália
998 _a20100723
_b1010^b
_cDaiane
999 _aConvertido do Formato PHL
_bPHL2MARC21 1.1
_c15107
_d15107
041 _aeng