000			01530naa a2200205uu 4500
001			6032318010821
003			OSt
005			20190211160746.0
008			060323s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aPONDER, Daniel E. _923712
245	1	0	_aPresidential leadership in a fractured state : _bcapacity, autonomy, and the american state
260			_aPhiladelphia : _bRoutledge, _c2005
520	3		_aThis paper sets out a conceptual framework for studying the conditions under which presidential leadership in the United States can be thought of as autonomous. Unlike others, who view executive institutions as reflections of conflicts between dominant societal forces, I examine the case of the American presidency and focus on organizational–institutional considerations. Specifically, I focus on the process of institutionalization as a means of building capacity, which I argue, in contrast to others, is a necessary condition for autonomy. Additionally, Iargue that work on the presidency, and the American state in general, suffers from a level of analysis problem, which obscures opportunities for identifying and analyzing autonomous presidential leadership. I conclude with thoughts for a research agenda.
590			_aVolume 28
590			_aNumbers 5-6
773	0	8	_tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA _g28, 5-6 , p. 531 - 546 _dPhiladelphia : Routledge, 2005 _xISSN 01900692 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20060323 _b1801^b _cNatália
998			_a20100723 _b1022^b _cDaiane
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c15126 _d15126
041			_aeng