000			01763naa a2200169uu 4500
001			6032415490421
003			OSt
005			20190211160804.0
008			060324s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aHARLOW, Carol _923764
245	1	0	_aLaw and public administration : _bconvergence and symbiosis
260			_aThousand Oaks, CA : _bSage publications, _cJune 2005
520	3		_aIn the light of historical tensions, this article considers some classical administrative law responses to changing techniques of public administration. Rejecting the customary reproach that law is unresponsive to the needs of public administrators, the article nonetheless identifies a widespread conviction that control and accountability are the primary objectives of administrative law. The response of administrators overwhelmed by procedural requirements is to fall back on ‘soft law’ techniques. The article notes the growing use of ‘soft law’ and recourse to ‘soft’ techniques of governance in the European Union, together with a possible convergence of legal and administrative values, as standards of ‘good governance’ and ‘principles of good administration’ acceptable to both sides are promulgated and enforced by courts. As ‘good governance’ standards are disseminated by international and transnational institutions, the article predicts a similar pattern of tension and evasion, as procedurally oriented administrative law systems enforced by transnational adjudicative organs develop to occupy the global administrative space.
773	0	8	_tInternational Review of Administrative Sciences _g71, 2, p. 279-294 _dThousand Oaks, CA : Sage publications, June 2005 _xISSN 0020-8523 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20060324 _b1549^b _cNatália
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c15170 _d15170
041			_aeng