000 | 01780naa a2200241uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 6032710351621 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211160817.0 | ||
008 | 060327s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aBÚRCA, Gráinne de _923845 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aRethinking law in neofunctionalist theory |
260 |
_aPhiladelphia, PA : _bRoutledge, _cApril 2005 |
||
520 | 3 | _aHaas's original neofunctionalist theory did not give express consideration to the role of law in the integration process. However, neofunctionalism had an intuitive resonance for legal scholars who generally assumed that law played an important part in advancing European integration. Political science scholarship which has addressed the role of law, on the other hand, has usually either (e.g. in neorealist accounts) taken law to be a functional tool serving the political process, or (e.g. in neofunctionalist analyses) examined only a limited dimension of law, focusing primarily on courts and on legal rather than political integration. However, a promising research agenda on the dynamics of European integration examples of which, building on Haas's work, have recently begun to appear could develop if legal scholars paid more attention to the empirical methodologies and explanatory theories of political science, and if political scientists adopted a less reductionist and more nuanced account of law. | |
650 | 4 |
_aCourts _923846 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aLaw _920298 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aLegal integration _923847 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aNeofunctionalism _923826 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aPolitical integration _923848 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of European Public Policy _g12, 2, p. 310 - 326 _dPhiladelphia, PA : Routledge, April 2005 _xISSN 1350-1763 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20060327 _b1035^b _cNatália |
||
998 |
_a20100623 _b1614^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c15203 _d15203 |
||
041 | _aeng |