| 000 | 01715naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 6032815132821 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211160838.0 | ||
| 008 | 060328s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aScott R. Furlong _923965 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aInterest Group Participation in Rule Making : _bA Decade of Change |
| 260 |
_aLondon, UK : _bOxford journals, _cJuly 2005 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aTen years ago we completed a survey that examined interest group participation in the rule-making process. At the time, it was the first major study to examine the role of interest groups in one of the most important policy-making venues in our democratic system. This article reexamines interest group participation in rule making a decade later. We focus most of the study on comparisons in how organizations access rule-making agencies, what techniques are used to lobby agencies, and the perceived effectiveness of these techniques by the organizations themselves. In addition, given the relatively new phenomenon of erule making and the increase of other electronic communication techniques, we open an examination of interest groups use of these forms of communications and their implications. We find that rule making continues to be a primary concern of organizations trying to influence federal public policy, even as they have focused more on campaign and grassroots activities. In some ways, these efforts are more important now than they were ten years ago. | |
| 700 | 1 |
_aCornelius M. Kerwin _923966 |
|
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory _g15, 3, p. 353-370 _dLondon, UK : Oxford journals, July 2005 _xISSN 1053-1858 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20060328 _b1513^b _cNatália |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c15256 _d15256 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||