000			01767naa a2200193uu 4500
001			6040310082821
003			OSt
005			20190211160929.0
008			060403s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aSCHOUT, Adriaan _924176
245	1	0	_aCoordinated European Governance : _bSelf-Organizing or Centrally Steered?
260			_aCanberra, Australia : _bBlackwell publishing, _cMarch 2005
520	3		_aNow that it is widely accepted that the European Union (EU) constitutes a system of governance, analysts need actively to explore precisely how it may affect the continuing struggle better to coordinate national and European administrations. In its 2001 White Paper on governance, the European Commission interpreted governance to mean less central control and more network-led steering. Its interpretation of such networks is that they are self-organizing. Drawing upon an empirical study of environmental policy integration (EPI) in the EU, this article shows that this vision may not adequately fit the multi-actor, multi-level coordination challenges associated with some EU problems. By studying the administrative capacities that the European Commission and three member states have created to achieve better environmental coordination, this article shows significant administrative weaknesses. It concludes that the coordination challenges now troubling the EU require a more thoughtful discussion of network management than the White Paper suggests.
700	1		_aJORDAN, Andrew _95295
773	0	8	_tPublic Administration an International Quarterly _g83, 1, p. 201-220 _dCanberra, Australia : Blackwell publishing, March 2005 _xISSN 0033-3298 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20060403 _b1008^b _cNatália
998			_a20130620 _b0847^b _ckarina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c15384 _d15384
041			_aeng