000			02032naa a2200169uu 4500
001			6040310244021
003			OSt
005			20190211160930.0
008			060403s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aSPICKER, Paul _920764
245	1	0	_aTargeting, residual welfare and related concepts : _bmodes of operation in public policy
260			_aCanberra, Australia : _bBlackwell publishing, _cJune 2005
520	3		_aA mode of operation defines a pattern of policy-making or approach to policy. This paper attempts to deconstruct the relationship between certain modes of operation, political ideology and specific techniques, using the main example of targeting. Targeting is commonly related to a number of other concepts, including selectivity, means-testing, conditionality, residual welfare, and rationing. The inter-connectedness of the issues is often taken for granted: residualism implies selectivity, selectivity is undertaken by means-testing, selectivity and means-testing are a form of targeting, targeting and conditionality substantially overlap, and all of them have played an important role in the development of arguments for the limitations on expenditure and the restriction of welfare provision. But the methods can be used in different systems, for different purposes. Means-testing is not the same thing as selectivity; selectivity is not the same thing as conditionality or targeting; rationing can take place in any kind of service; and none of these options is necessarily residualist. Modes of operation are often compounded with political aims, the structural context of policy, discussions of implementation and the application of specific policies. When the concepts are unravelled, it becomes possible to think of the methods and approaches involved in different ways.
773	0	8	_tPublic Administration an International Quarterly _g83, 2, p. 345-366 _dCanberra, Australia : Blackwell publishing, June 2005 _xISSN 0033-3298 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20060403 _b1024^b _cNatália
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c15388 _d15388
041			_aeng