000 | 01549naa a2200253uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 6040609411821 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211160951.0 | ||
008 | 060406s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aMCFAUL, Michael _924374 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aTransitions from Postcommunism |
260 |
_aWashington, DC : _bThe Johns Hopkins University Press , _cJuly 2005 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe years since 2000 have seen a surprising new wave of democratic breakthroughs in the postcommunist countries of Serbia, Georgia, and Ukraine. This article compares and contrasts these three cases, naming seven common factors which made the breakthroughs in these countries possible: 1) a semi-autocratic rather than fully autocratic regime; 2) an unpopular incumbent; 3) a united and organized opposition; 4) an ability quickly to drive home the point that voting results were falsified, 5) enough independent media to inform citizens about the falsified vote, 6) a political opposition capable of mobilizing tens of thousands or more demonstrators to protest electoral fraud, and 7) divisions among the regime's coercive forces. | |
650 | 4 |
_aDemocracia _911984 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aSerbia and Montenegro _924375 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aSerbia _924376 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aGeorgia (Republic) _924377 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aUkraine _924378 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aPolitics and government _924339 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of Democracy _g16, 3, p. 5-19 _dWashington, DC : The Johns Hopkins University Press , July 2005 _xISSN 1045-5736 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20060406 _b0941^b _cNatália |
||
998 |
_a20140627 _b0931^b _ckarina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c15478 _d15478 |
||
041 | _aeng |