000			01844naa a2200181uu 4500
001			6041114563921
003			OSt
005			20190211161002.0
008			060411s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aABIZADEH, Arash _932
245	1	0	_aDoes collective identity presuppose an other? On the alleged incoherence of global solidarity
260			_aNew York, NY : _bAmerican Political Science Association, _cFebruary 2005
520	3		_aTwo arguments apparently support the thesis that collective identity presupposes an Other: the recognition argument, according to which seeing myself as a self requires recognition by an other whom I also recognize as a self (Hegel); and the dialogic argument, according to which my sense of self can only develop dialogically (Taylor). But applying these arguments to collective identity involves a compositional fallacy. Two modern ideologies mask the particularist thesis's falsehood. The ideology of indivisible state sovereignty makes sovereignty as such appear particularistic by fusing “internal” with “external” sovereignty; nationalism imagines national identity as particularistic by linking it to sovereignty. But the concatenation of internal sovereignty, external sovereignty, and nation is contingent. Schmitt's thesis that “the political” presupposes an other conflates internal and external sovereignty, while Mouffe's neo-Schmittianism conflates difference (Derrida) with alterity. A shared global identity may face many obstacles, but metaphysical impossibility and conceptual confusion are not among them.
773	0	8	_tAmerican Political Science Review _g99, 1, p. 45-60 _dNew York, NY : American Political Science Association, February 2005 _xISSN 0003-0554 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20060411 _b1456^b _cNatália
998			_a20060411 _b1522^b _cNatália
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c15516 _d15516
041			_aeng