000 | 01475naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 6041214241321 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20230711150932.0 | ||
008 | 060412s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_94021 _a Gerber, Alan S. |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aCorrection to Gerber and Green (2000), Replication of Disputed Findings, and Reply to Imai (2005) |
260 |
_aNew York, NY : _bAmerican Political Science Association, _cMay 2005 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThis essay corrects the results reported in Gerber and Green 2000 and replies to Imai (2005). When data-processing errors are repaired, the original substantive findings from the New Haven experiment remain unchanged. As previously reported, brief phone calls do not increase voter turnout. The correction that Imai (2005) offers, which purports to show that these phone calls produce large, significant, and robust increases in voter turnout, is shown to contain statistical, computational, and reporting errors that invalidate its conclusions about the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of phone calls and mail. A replication of the New Haven experiment reproduces both the findings reported in Gerber and Green 2000 and the biases of Imai's statistical analysis. | |
700 | 1 |
_94320 _a Green, Donald P. |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tAmerican Political Science Review _g99, 2, p. 301-313 _dNew York, NY : American Political Science Association, May 2005 _xISSN 0003-0554 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20060412 _b1424^b _cNatália |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c15540 _d15540 |
||
041 | _aeng |