000 | 01822naa a2200229uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 6041315404321 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211161019.0 | ||
008 | 060413s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aWRIGHT, Alex _924483 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aUsing scenarios to challenge and change management thinking |
260 |
_aUK : _bRoutledge, _cJanuary 2005 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThis article identifies that one of the primary tasks of quality is to challenge the way managers think. Quality accomplishes this from an operational perspective while scenarios are presented as a way of achieving this same goal from a strategic stance. The scenario approach is argued to have similarities with a quality sensitivity, in that it is essentially processual in nature (van der Heijden, 1996) and has organisational learning as its ultimate focus (De Geus, 1988). Scenarios are explained and contrasted with traditional approaches to strategy and the various definitions, purposes and benefits proposed by its advocates are presented and discussed in relation to quality issues such as six sigma. A scenario matrix is constructed for the future of quality in Europe. This matrix allows for the grouping of key forces and trends that may affect the role of quality in Europe into loose couplings of relationships. The four quadrants of the matrix provide the basis for four alternative scenarios depicting quality in Europe in the year 2008; each scenario is briefly explained. | |
650 | 4 |
_aScenarios _924484 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aScenario planning _924485 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aStrategy _912376 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aQuality in Europe _924486 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tTotal Quality Management & Business Excellence _g16, 1, p. 87 - 103 _dUK : Routledge, January 2005 _xISSN 1478-3363 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20060413 _b1540^b _cNatália |
||
998 |
_a20081212 _b1041^b _cZailton |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c15565 _d15565 |
||
041 | _aeng |