| 000 | 01718naa a2200265uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 6042415175621 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20220217145950.0 | ||
| 008 | 060424s2006 bl ||||gr |0|| 0 por d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aAMORIM NETO, Octavio _9350 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aA conexão presidencial : _bfacções pró e antigoverno e disciplina partidária no Brasil |
| 260 |
_aRio de Janeiro : _bIUPERJ, _c2001 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aThe article provides an explanation for the enormous variation in party discipline during the Brazilian democratic experience from 1946 to 1964. The argument is that party discipline is a function of the Presidents strategies in forging coalitions in Congress. One of the main consequences of such strategies was the creation of two factions within parties, one for and the other against the President. The premise is that the size of each faction affects its level of discipline. According to an econometric analysis of 982 roll-call votes, crucial determinants of discipline in the larger parties were the amount of budget resources allocated to them by the President and the time remaining in the Presidents term. | |
| 650 | 4 |
_aBrazil _912644 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aParty discipline _925270 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aPatronage _912649 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aFactions as defined by position vis-à-vis the President _925271 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aPresidents of the Republic _925272 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_914036 _aSantos, Fabiano |
|
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tDados - Revista de Ciências Sociais _g44, 2, p. 291-322 _dRio de Janeiro : IUPERJ, 2001 _xISSN 0011-5258 _w |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_uhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582001000200003&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt _yAcesso |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20060424 _b1517^b _cNatália |
||
| 998 |
_a20080825 _b1023^b _cZailton |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c15845 _d15845 |
||
| 041 | _apor | ||