000 02118naa a2200253uu 4500
001 6042416012521
003 OSt
005 20190524093929.0
008 060424s2006 bl ||||gr |0|| 0 por d
100 1 _aMAINWARING, Scott
_920448
245 1 0 _aClassificando Regimes Políticos na América Latina, 1945-1999.
260 _aRio de Janeiro :
_bIUPERJ,
_c2001
520 3 _aThis paper is about two related subjects: how to classify political regimes in general, and how Latin American regimes should be classified for the 1945-1999 period. We make five general claims about regime classification. First, regime classification should rest on sound concepts and definitions. Second, it should be based on explicit and sensible coding and aggregation rules. Third, it necessarily involves some subjective judgments. Fourth, the debate about dichotomous versus continuous measures of democracy creates a false dilemma. Neither democratic theory, nor coding requirements, nor the reality underlying democratic practice compel either a dichotomous or a continuous approach in all cases. Fifth, dichotomous measures of democracy fail to capture intermediate regime types, obscuring variation that is essential for studying political regimes. This general discussion provides the grounding for our trichotomous ordinal scale, which codes regimes as democratic, semi-democratic or authoritarian in nineteen Latin American countries from 1945 to 1999. Our trichotomous classification achieves greater differentiation than dichotomous classifications and yet avoids the need for massive information that a very fine grained measure would require.
650 4 _aPolitical regimes
_925301
650 4 _aLatin America
_923851
650 4 _aMeasures of democracy
_925302
700 1 _aBRINKS, Daniel
_925303
700 1 _925304
_aPérez-Liñán, Aníbal
773 0 8 _tDados - Revista de Ciências Sociais
_g44, 4, p. 645-688
_dRio de Janeiro : IUPERJ, 2001
_xISSN 0011-5258
_w
856 4 2 _uhttp://www.scielo.br/pdf/dados/v44n4/a01v44n4.pdf
_yAcesso
942 _cS
998 _a20060424
_b1601^b
_cNatália
998 _a20080825
_b1410^b
_cZailton
999 _aConvertido do Formato PHL
_bPHL2MARC21 1.1
_c15854
_d15854
041 _apor