000 | 01754naa a2200229uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 6042513391121 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190212095551.0 | ||
008 | 060425s2006 bl ||||gr |0|| 0 por d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aKERSTENETZKY, Célia Lessa _925417 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aEvolução e desígnio em Hayek |
260 |
_aRio de Janeiro : _bIUPERJ, _c1999 |
||
520 | 3 | _aIn an examination of Hayeks social philosophy, the article seeks to distinguish between socio-epistemological arguments, which postulate the radical ignorance of social actors, and the conservative political conclusions usually associated with Hayeks thought, which prophesy the destruction of the spontaneous order owing to efforts to intervene in the social world. The ultimate purpose of drawing this distinction is to lay the ground for a discussion of a new alliance, one between these arguments and the possibility of design. This exploration of multi-sided Hayekian argumentation allows us to identify some ambiguities essential towards the articles purposes. The most important ambiguity appears in the argument against planned changes, where Hayek describes the foreseeable negative consequences of such changes and also sketches the scenario shaped by the foreseeable beneficial effects of the undisturbed operation of the spontaneous order. | |
650 | 4 |
_aHayek _925418 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aConstructivism _917935 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aEvolutionism _925419 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tDados - Revista de Ciências Sociais _g42, 3, p. 453-470 _dRio de Janeiro : IUPERJ, 1999 _xISSN 0011-5258 _w |
856 | 4 | 2 |
_uhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52581999000300003&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt _yAcesso |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20060425 _b1339^b _cNatália |
||
998 |
_a20080902 _b1018^b _cZailton |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c15901 _d15901 |
||
041 | _apor |