000 01717naa a2200229uu 4500
001 6042513594721
003 OSt
005 20240614182952.0
008 060425s2006 bl ||||gr |0|| 0 por d
100 1 _91328
_aBosch, Renato Raul
245 1 0 _aDescentralização, clientelismo e capital social na governança urbana :
_bcomparando Belo Horizonte e Salvador.
260 _aRio de Janeiro :
_bIUPERJ,
_c1999
520 3 _aIn this comparison of Belo Horizonte’s and Salvador’s experiences within three arenas of local government, the article focuses on the viability of institutional arrangements based on decentralization and citizen participation. It concludes that the relative success achieved when inaugurating city master plans, participatory budgeting (where civil society has direct input in budget definitions), and sectoral councils (councils for decentralized policy issue areas) is linked to three factors: prior decentralization processes; articulation between different decision-making units; and, above all, the neutralization of clientelistic control mechanisms through the introduction of horizontal loyalty networks and spaces of representation that in the final analysis will foster greater social capital and accountability.
650 4 _aDescentralização
_914289
650 4 _aParticipação
_912387
650 4 _aAdministração Regional
_912242
773 0 8 _tDados - Revista de Ciências Sociais
_g42, 4, p. 655-690
_dRio de Janeiro : IUPERJ, 1999
_xISSN 0011-5258
_w
856 4 2 _uhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52581999000400002&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt
_yAcesso
942 _cS
998 _a20060425
_b1359^b
_cNatália
998 _a20140820
_b0923^b
_ckarina
999 _aConvertido do Formato PHL
_bPHL2MARC21 1.1
_c15907
_d15907
041 _apor