000 | 01552naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 6082810492621 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211161141.0 | ||
008 | 060828s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aPOST, Robert _927507 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aDemocracy and equality |
260 |
_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cJanuary 2006 |
||
520 | 3 | _aIf democracy is defined as the form of government dedicated to the realization of the values of selfdetermination, democracy bears a complex relationship to equality. Democracy requires equality of democratic agency, which is different from the forms of equality that flow from the values of distributive justice or fairness. Indeed, insofar as the forms of equality demanded by distributive justice are defined by reference to philosophic reason, rather than by reference to democratic self-determination, there is an intrinsic tension between democracy and distributive justice. This tension is reflected in the common conflict between rights and legislative competence. But insofar as violations of the equality required by distributive justice impair democratic legitimacy, democracy requires that these violations be rectified. Changing conceptions of distributive justice may thus fundamentally alter the preconditions of democratic legitimacy. | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tThe Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science _g603, p. 24-36 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, January 2006 _xISSN 00027162 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20060828 _b1049^b _cNatália |
||
998 |
_a20100803 _b1053^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c19159 _d19159 |
||
041 | _aeng |