000			01707naa a2200181uu 4500
001			6082811025921
003			OSt
005			20190211161142.0
008			060828s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aKRISLOV, Samuel _927509
245	1	0	_aCan the welfare state survive in a globalization legal order?
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cJanuary 2006
520	3		_aThe notion that markets lead to law and freedom is said to have originated in Adam Smith's work and is rooted in history. Both the progression and roots seem highly problematic. Neo-Smithian approaches have been refurbished by general acceptance of a contingent nature of the relation. They have also been enhanced by the failures of European Marxist economics in ways predicted with uncanny accuracy. On the other hand, neoclassical claims that democratic welfare systems were only a step away from similar failures have been refuted. Hopes that an international system might impose democracy from outside the nation-state are overly optimistic. Nationalism is rife, with a continuing outburst of ethnic secessions, and little yielding of power to supranational decision makers. The greatest success of supranational authority has rather been in creating subsidiary structures, unlikely to implement fundamental transformation but with potential for supporting such a thrust. These include expert-based operations and the network of nongovernmental organizations.
773	0	8	_tThe Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science _g603, p. 54-79 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, January 2006 _xISSN 00027162 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20060828 _b1102^b _cNatália
998			_a20100803 _b1056^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c19162 _d19162
041			_aeng